Home

07584-257050

Home Services Portfolio About Contact Free Stuff



INTELLIGENT BEHAVIOUR
Is AI playing by the rules?

AI has exploded onto the marketplace over the last year or so, and through a combination of machine learning, written prompts, and user-uploaded images, you can now easily generate countless pictures, illustrations and cartoons with just one click.


It is common belief that copyright in art and imagery is only applicable to that created by the human mind. In fact, a recent court case in the US stated that a piece of art created by AI was not eligible for copyright protection as it had been produced by non-humans. The decision follows on from increased pressure by writers, actors, musicians and photographers who feel that AI is threatening their jobs.


So how is AI imagery generated?


AI art generators use various algorithms and datasets to obtain, organise and reproduce information or imagery. The most popular of these systems is the “Text-to-Image” generator that allows anyone to type a description, and then with one click, generate a new piece of art. Another method is creating artwork from inputted photos known as “Photo-to-Art” generation. Both of these systems rely on algorithms which are trained to find content from the internet. It is this data collection and the pace of the technology that has led to issues in the correct copyright protections not being put into place.


AI and Copyright Infringement


As stated earlier, in many parts of the world, AI generated artwork cannot be copyrighted, but the images used to create that piece of art will be probably be copyrighted or owned by human artists or contributors. The UK is only one of a handful of countries that protects AI generated works, considering it to be “original human creativity” in that it requires a certain level of skill, labour and creativity to create. However, this legal approach is currently under review. Therefore, across the globe, the chances are, the results of an AI generated image may be subject to copyright infringements.


Getty Images already have a lawsuit against an AI generator that was using unlicensed Getty images to create artwork. Adobe’s AI software – Firefly – is trained to use licensed Adobe Stock imagery which helps to avoid the issue of copyright infringement with its users.


As a rule, you should always assume that AI generated content on the internet, unless it is available on a reputable Image Library, will be subject to copyright infringement, and for that reason should not be used for commercial purposes.


The future of AI and Copyright


AI technology is growing at an ever increasing rate. For the foreseeable future it looks like most countries will adhere to the ruling that AI generated images cannot be copyrighted. As AI is based on the use of data sets, artists, photographers, and Image Libraries may change how they copyright their works to make it harder for the algorithms to obtain their required subject matter.


AI is definitely here to stay, but one key takeaway from this is to always check how these images have been created. Copyright infringement will be a hot topic connected with this technology, so make sure that your AI imagery is licensed through a reputable Image Library.



Please note that the views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to any other group or individual. To ensure you are fully compliant with all current legislation, please take legal/professional advice and do not rely solely on the information provided in these articles.


Copyright © 2018-2023 David Lovatt Design Studio.  All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy, GDPR & Cookie Policy | Trading Terms

Contact Mail: welcome@dmlovatt.co.uk?subject=Enquiry from the website - David Lovatt Design Studio Contact

Return to Free Stuff Main Menu

Return to Free Stuff LEGISLATION